Yuku free message boards

I think it's more like, "we are too stupid to know what to believe."

I think I surmounted that problem when I wrote this:


The Sutton Report clearly exposes the fact that when it comes to deception, Ken Littleton is an absolute master, and anybody who doubts his guilt, is too gullible to take seriously.

I have a definite feeling in my mind, he told our investigator, that this murder was committed after 10:30 at night." Why do you say that? he was asked. Because, he responded cryptically.

The investigators inappropriately cleared Ken Littleton, because, in their words:

"... the perpetrator was most likely in a state of severe psychosis and intoxication. While we have indication that both Tommy and Michael were under the influence of alcohol, and possibly drugs, that night, Littleton seems to have been clean in that regard."

How can anybody be that ignorant? How can anybody suggest that Ken Littleton was not "under the influence" when the voices in his lunatic head have dictated his entire life?

The Sutton Report's free-flow speculation provides the opportunity to accuse anybody of the murder of Martha Moxley, but a thorough analysis identifies a single murderer, and that person is Ken Littleton.

The Sutton Report is not without merit because it identified the right questions...but it has failed to answer them, and it is about time... To quote directly from the Sutton Report:

"... to say, as he [Ken Littleton] has, that he didnt even notice her [Martha Moxley] at all seems to be going too far in the other direction. She was in the house that evening on at least two occasions. By most accounts, she was very attractive and out-going. She and Tommy were cavorting very publicly by side of the house. Why wouldnt Littleton have noticed her? If he had, what would keep him from admitting that?"

These are the questions appropriately asked and not answered in the Sutton Report, the lapse is not excusable, and it's about time...

Q: Why wouldnt Littleton have noticed Martha Moxley?
A: Ken Littleton needed an alibi.

Q: If Ken Littleton had noticed Martha Moxley, what would keep him from admitting that?"
A: The obsession to cover up the fact that bipolar sufferer, Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley.

The Sutton Report accurately depicted the turmoil that governs Litttleton's life through rhetoric like:

"While there is no doubt Littleton was profoundly affected by Martha Moxleys murder and its subsequent investigation, to what end his problems can be attributed to this event is uncertain. He is a haunted man, but why? Is he somehow responsible?

Is he involved in some complicity, some conspiracy?

Ken Littleton is a wild card--literally and figuratively. If he is entirely innocent of any involvement in the murder of Martha Moxley, he has certainly gone to great lengths to make it seem otherwise."

The claim "to what end his problems can be attributed to this event [the murder of Martha Moxley] is uncertain" is rather silly because bipolar sufferers like Ken Littleton do not compartmentalize, their entire lives are one big predictable mess.

Indeed, to quote directly from the Sutton report, Ken Litleton did not have a life, he had a series of crime spree incidents.

"Littletons crime spree on Nantucket, which he attributed to his drinking problem, brought him swiftly to the forefront of speculation in the investigation of Martha Moxleys murder. The Greenwich Police Departments efforts to attach the crime to Tommy Skakel had proven futile. Their focus now shifted. Defenders of Littleton insist the continued harassment of the Greenwich Police--who frequently questioned Littleton while he was working--lead to his dismissal from teaching jobs.

Littleton probably did lose teaching jobs because of his status as a suspect and the Greenwich Polices continued efforts to build a case against him, but he has only himself to blame for their interest. His foolish crimes on Nantucket were a red flag to investigators. Furthermore, to this day, he has left many questions unanswered about his actions and whereabouts on the night of October 30, 1975."

Ken Littleton cleverly blames drinking problems for his "crime spree" but the truth is, a basketcase like Ken Littleton is subject to psychological disorder, alcohol is merely an aggravating factor, it is not the cause.

It is difficult to imagine why the Sutton report claims that Ken Littleton is the "wild card" when he is in fact, the "wild man" who has never demonstrated the capacity to control his own life. To quote from the Sutton Report:

"Again, it is difficult to sift through the real and the paranoid when listening to the voice of Ken Littleton. We must remember, he is a man with a genetic and socio-cultural predisposition to bipolar mood disorder stemming from stressful occurrences, from which he now suffers. He is also a serious alcoholic, allegedly recovering through the assistance of twelve-step programs.

We must consider that Littleton may be a guilty man, haunted by his actions, who seeks for the sake of self-interest to protect himself by throwing speculation towards others. For all his problems and pitiable weaknesses, he is still an intelligent and potentially conniving convicted felon who has failed two lie-detector tests regarding the murder of Martha Moxley."

The possibility that Littleton is a completely innocent man, merely haunted by the specter of suspicion, is absolutely not credible, because Ken Littleton now claims that he has direct knowledge of the fact that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley, and that makes his obsession to manufacture an alibi the only consistent element that not only betrays Ken Littleton's inexplicable behavior but also responds to the material questions that have to be answered to be able to provide a comprehensive account about what happened to Martha Moxley.

First and foremost, it is not possible to talk about Ken Littleton and crime spree in a separate breath, and the Sutton Report summarized some of the allegations in the following manner:

"Unfortunately, there are many issues with regards to Ken Littleton that need further investigation and clarification before any resolution can be reached as to his possible involvement in the murder of Martha Moxley. As mentioned earlier in this section, a great number of allegations and innuendos have been made against Littleton, particularly after Greenwich Police Detectives Soloman [Solomon] and Garr recently intensified their interest in him. According to Ken, he willingly submitted to their questioning, but finally relented after it was clear he was being given the naked light-bulb treatment. Some of the allegations are as follows: 1) Ken Littleton had some sort of a sexual encounter with the wife of a fellow teacher from the Brunswick school at a softball picnic during the Spring of 1976. Although there were no charges brought, it has been alleged that Littleton was attempting to rape her. 2) Other somewhat similar incidents of teenaged girls bludgeoned to death are alleged to have occurred in close proximity to Littletons whereabouts. 3) Littleton was arrested for DWI and Assault and Battery, after having been driving the wrong way down a street frequented by prostitutes. He mumbled that 'he had to speak to the Kennedys.' "

If this lunatic who is obsessed with the Kennedys, is allowed to get away with the murder of Martha Moxley, then Michael Skakel is the biggest scapegoat in the entire world, next to Lee Harvey Oswald.

Clearly, Ken Littleton's troubled life would satisfy most reasonable people that he is a dangerous criminal who does not deserve to be free. To quote directly from the Sutton Report:

"1) Within a year of the murder, Littleton was given and failed two polygraph tests. At first, Littleton claimed he was being represented by Tommys attorney, Manny Margolis, but then retained John Meerbergen. 2) After making a full confession with regards to his crime spree on Nantucket, Littleton is given a 5-7 year suspended sentence in May of 1977. He refused to submit to a sodium amytal interview regarding the murder of Martha Moxley in exchange for a reduced charge. 3) Littleton was arrested at least three times in Orlando, Florida. On February 14, 1982, his [WW] is convicted on charges of trespassing and disorderly conduct. When arrested, he gives a false name. On February 28, 1982, he is convicted of disorderly conduct again.

On March 3, 1982, Littleton is convicted of shoplifting. We know he was drinking heavily at this point. 4) In subsequent years, he was arrested for numerous Driving While Intoxicated offenses. The period when Littleton was in Florida, however, is of special portent. Martha Moxleys father, before his passing, recorded in his papers that Littleton called him at that time and expressed condolence for Marthas death, saying he wanted to take a sodium pentathol test to help solve the case. When asked about this call by our investigator in Boston, Littleton initially denied ever speaking with Mr. Moxley. He claimed that only his wife had actually spoke [sp] to Mr. Moxley. When later confronted with the specific recollections of the call from Mr. Moxleys personal papers, Littleton conceded he may have spoken to him while in a state of severe intoxication, stating, Maybe I spoke to him when I was really shit-faced.

Littletons accusers have pointed to this incident as an indication of his guilt and need for contrition."

The insanity of anybody who still defends a deranged criminal who is probably still tormenting innocent people like Martha Moxley's father, is not subject to dispute. When Ken Littleton was interviewed for the first time, he said, "He never went out that night after dinner ... he saw nothing suspicious."

Today, Ken Littleton facilitates the opportunity to kill again by claiming that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley.

In the final analysis, the Sutton Report is a bizarre document because it implicates Ken Littleton through fact and clears him through speculation. It is time to recognize the facts.

Even the media has exposed the lunacy that governs Ken Littleton, and this is another, direct quote from the Sutton Report:

"A couple of years ago, the tabloid television program, A Current Affair, ambushed Littleton in Canada for an expose-style interview. Anxious, stuttering, and shaking uncontrollably, Ken initially tried to flee the encounter, but then awkwardly relented. He made a few comments and answered some questions while remaining just barely within the realm of coherence. He is a man who suffers from severe depression and alcoholism, and his demeanor is inherently disabled. In this regard, he is his own worst accuser."

In conclusion, the Sutton Report clearly indicates, that the claim that Michael or Tommy Skakel had anything to do with the murder of Martha Moxley is subject to prejudicial analysis. The claim that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley is only subject to unanswered questions. It is time to answer the questions; Ken Littleton is his own worst accuser because he murdered Martha Moxley.